CVE-2026-98028
N/A
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
eth: nfp: drop the replaced rule from the list when reprogramming fails
nfp_net_fs_add() replaces an existing rule by deleting it from the hardware, decrementing nn->fs.count and programming the new one. If nfp_net_fs_add_hw() fails the old entry stays on nn->fs.list - only the success path reaches list_replace() - so the list is one longer than nn->fs.count, and it advertises a rule whose hardware entry has already been torn down.
nn->fs.count is what ETHTOOL_GRXCLSRLCNT reports, so userspace then sizes its buffer one entry short of what the GRXCLSRLALL walk wants to write. That used to overwrite one u32 past the allocation; since the walk is bounded it is a permanent -EMSGSIZE instead, as nothing ever resyncs the counter.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 9eb03bb1c035ff6e2c3a34046419446588253dda < 603b70093f729f52a37544b48679903cad834856 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 9eb03bb1c035ff6e2c3a34046419446588253dda < edaec279f59f801a05b751df475ed71a0a68c88a | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 9eb03bb1c035ff6e2c3a34046419446588253dda < 552e528a7d85cbe088b2ae4f78194713975b46cf | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 9eb03bb1c035ff6e2c3a34046419446588253dda < 108bb2142e3a12c9ad625ad662973127a113ddc6 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.8 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 6.8 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.12.111 <= 6.12.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.18.53 <= 6.18.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.2.7 <= 7.2.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.3-rc3 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/603b70093f729f52a37544b48679903cad834856
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/edaec279f59f801a05b751df475ed71a0a68c88a
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/552e528a7d85cbe088b2ae4f78194713975b46cf
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/108bb2142e3a12c9ad625ad662973127a113ddc6
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.