CVE-2026-97410
N/A
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netconsole: take target_cleanup_list_lock in drop_netconsole_target()
drop_netconsole_target() unlinks the target while only holding target_list_lock. However, when the underlying interface has been unregistered, netconsole_netdev_event() moves the target from target_list to target_cleanup_list, and netconsole_process_cleanups_core() walks that list under target_cleanup_list_lock only.
If a user removes the configfs target at the same time the cleanup worker is iterating target_cleanup_list, list_del() can corrupt the list because the two paths take disjoint locks while operating on the same list node.
Acquire target_cleanup_list_lock around the list_del() so the unlink is serialised against netconsole_process_cleanups_core() regardless of which list the target currently belongs to. The state transition that downgrades STATE_DEACTIVATED to STATE_DISABLED is left intact and is performed under the same combined locking, preserving the existing ordering with resume_target().
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 97714695ef904a4bdba75ca2f339215c0ae2b1fa < 84592ee22f7d1583ce33aa733411ff36c7a1c44c | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 97714695ef904a4bdba75ca2f339215c0ae2b1fa < fe8e6c0a2f28bdab14cdf7eff4dd9755d3793007 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 97714695ef904a4bdba75ca2f339215c0ae2b1fa < 91aeb87f052367a5a2743cc93777dfb4386f2f14 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.12 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 6.12 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.12.111 <= 6.12.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.18.53 <= 6.18.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.2 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/84592ee22f7d1583ce33aa733411ff36c7a1c44c
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fe8e6c0a2f28bdab14cdf7eff4dd9755d3793007
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/91aeb87f052367a5a2743cc93777dfb4386f2f14
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.