CVE-2026-92491
N/A
N/A
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
firmware: arm_scmi: Roll back partial protocol table registration
scmi_protocol_table_register() can leave earlier requests registered when a later entry in the same ID table fails. Each request retains a pointer to the driver's ID table, so a failed module load can leave a dangling pointer after the module storage is released.
Unrequest only the successfully registered prefix, in reverse order, before returning the failure. Leave the failed entry and the remaining entries untouched because matching requests can be owned by another driver.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 41714150f3d148fbcd7a947869c85531b53c50d4 < ee556d118b11c6f5b60a32c1e84f366b336ac7d7 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 2858f6e5f06440d6b9e9c3f57bc68915344830a9 < 3fa8cabd2d8ed80dd0b818ca7fd410b591392ff6 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 2858f6e5f06440d6b9e9c3f57bc68915344830a9 < 456856a34906475fcf4b23879237103770dc7ef2 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 2858f6e5f06440d6b9e9c3f57bc68915344830a9 < 826413b858ea2969e4c3e8197d0065efc47c6343 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 2858f6e5f06440d6b9e9c3f57bc68915344830a9 < 2224b622260ba590ab56ea1585d6bf7610be25b2 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.9 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 6.9 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.12.110 <= 6.12.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.18.52 <= 6.18.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.2.6 <= 7.2.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.3-rc1 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee556d118b11c6f5b60a32c1e84f366b336ac7d7
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3fa8cabd2d8ed80dd0b818ca7fd410b591392ff6
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/456856a34906475fcf4b23879237103770dc7ef2
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/826413b858ea2969e4c3e8197d0065efc47c6343
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2224b622260ba590ab56ea1585d6bf7610be25b2
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.