CVE-2026-89768
N/A
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs: fix user path of nested backing files
backing_file_open() derives the path to be stored in the new backing file from user_file->f_path. This is incorrect when user_file itself is a backing file, which is the case for nested stacking filesystems, e.g. overlayfs mounts where the lowerdir of one overlayfs is the merged directory of another. Since commit def3ae83da02 ("fs: store real path instead of fake path in backing file f_path") the f_path of a backing file holds the real path of the intermediate layer, not the path that the user opened.
Commit 924577e4f6ca ("ovl: Fix nested backing file paths") fixed this for such configurations by passing file_user_path() from ovl_open_realfile(). However, commit 6af36aeb147a ("lsm: add backing_file LSM hooks") changed the first argument of backing_file_open() from the user path back to the user file and derived the path from user_file->f_path again, silently re-introducing the problem.
As a result, files mapped through a nested overlayfs show the wrong path in /proc/<pid>/maps and in perf/ftrace mmap records. For example, with two nested overlayfs mounts:
mkdir -p /ovl/{lower,upper,work,merged} /ovl/nested
echo hello > /ovl/lower/foo
mount -t overlay overlay
-o lowerdir=/ovl/lower,upperdir=/ovl/upper,workdir=/ovl/work
/ovl/merged
at least two lowerdirs are needed when upperdir is nonexistent
mount -t overlay overlay
-o lowerdir=/ovl/merged:/ovl/lower /ovl/nested
mapping /ovl/nested/foo shows a disconnected path instead of the user path:
readlink /proc/self/fd/3
/ovl/nested/foo
grep foo /proc/self/maps
7f6e2c100000-7f6e2c101000 r–s 00000000 00:24 15813027 /foo
The bogus path is derived from the f_path of the intermediate backing file, whose mount is a private clone that d_path() cannot resolve.
Fix this by using file_user_path(), which returns the outermost user-visible path for backing files and falls back to &user_file->f_path for regular files. This restores the behavior of commit 924577e4f6ca ("ovl: Fix nested backing file paths") for overlayfs and also fixes the same problem for the other backing_file_open() callers, fuse passthrough and erofs ishare, when their user file is itself a backing file.
backing_tmpfile_open() has the same pattern but is not affected: it is only called by ovl_create_tmpfile() for the upper layer, and another overlayfs is rejected as upperdir by the DCACHE_OP_REAL check in ovl_mount_dir_check(), so its user_file can never be a backing file.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 5b6aa9a843205da92d860e5011a7b29062a76b8f < 88c927a63dc717b6d46b20fe13ea713916e49089 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 5dfcb15974e7d0f96aca278dd9f1b85df91523ef < c03114634d342648bd34910aa8fb88007e92cc3c | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6af36aeb147a06dea47c49859cd6ca5659aeb987 < a35cc21355734e1acb89973d9be90ca8e4c3ed2f | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6af36aeb147a06dea47c49859cd6ca5659aeb987 < f2381b546e7e6a35c9fcee0d0ccb6c042a9aeb5d | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 41c5b269af8b1f0bffcab7766a793f294ae6764e | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 27e795afba0018b0ea9460dbad4bd706d1ba5ee0 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.12.95 < 6.12.109 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.18.38 < 6.18.50 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.6.144 < 6.7 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.0.4 < 7.1 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.1 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 7.1 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.12.109 <= 6.12.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.18.50 <= 6.18.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.2.4 <= 7.2.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.3-rc1 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88c927a63dc717b6d46b20fe13ea713916e49089
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c03114634d342648bd34910aa8fb88007e92cc3c
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a35cc21355734e1acb89973d9be90ca8e4c3ed2f
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2381b546e7e6a35c9fcee0d0ccb6c042a9aeb5d
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.