CVE-2026-82750
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Summary
Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in ZenHive mpp allows an unauthenticated remote client to inflate the fee-payer's gas cost per sponsored payment by a large multiplier and to have the sponsor pay for EIP-7702 account delegations of the client's choosing.
When the server sponsors Tempo payments, MPP.Methods.Tempo.FeePayerPolicy.measure/3 in lib/mpp/methods/tempo/fee_payer_policy.ex bounds the gas fields, the fee budget, the validity window and the access list of the client-signed 0x76 envelope, but never reads its aa_authorization_list field. Every signed delegation in that list is charged as intrinsic gas before the payment call runs, so a client attaching delegations from throwaway authority keys makes the sponsor pay for them within the default gas_limit ceiling. At the reporter's default of seven entries the sponsored cost rises from about 46,575 gas to about 1,884,087 gas. Because each entry is applied as a persistent set-code delegation, a client can also upgrade its own accounts to delegated code at the sponsor's expense.
This issue affects mpp: from 0.2.0 before 0.16.1.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZenHive | mpp | 0.2.0 < 0.16.1 | affected |
| ZenHive | mpp | d29d54e507918db00a5b65d90136b73166c017d7 < 0482572b47e1ffe1537ab80ab613d47b92833c2d | affected |
Weaknesses
- CWE-1284: CWE-1284 Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
Workarounds
Disable Tempo fee sponsorship by leaving "fee_payer" at its default of false and setting no fee_payer_url, so the client pays its own gas. Where sponsorship must stay enabled, lower the max_gas override in fee_payer_policy to just above what a legitimate sponsored payment needs (a TIP-20 transfer is roughly 50,000 gas), so an envelope padded with delegations either fails the policy or runs out of gas at a bounded cost. This bounds the inflation without closing it.
References
- https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/security/advisories/GHSA-5qrp-r24c-w6jr
- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82750.html
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82750
- https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/commit/0482572b47e1ffe1537ab80ab613d47b92833c2d
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.