CVE-2026-82744
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Summary
Not Failing Securely (Failing Open) vulnerability in ash-project ash skips an Ash.Reactor change when the guard controlling it raises, so a change meant to run does not.
An Ash.Reactor change step can be gated by where validations that decide whether the change runs. Ash.Reactor.ChangeStep (lib/ash/reactor/steps/change_step.ex) evaluated those guards in apply_where_clauses/3, and apply_validation rescued any exception into {:error, error}. The reduce treated that identically to a guard whose condition was simply not met and bypassed the change. So when a guard raises (for example on attacker-influenced input), a change that enforces a security-relevant modification is skipped rather than failing the step. The fix distinguishes a raised exception (now {:raised, error}) and halts the step with an error, failing closed.
This issue affects ash: from 3.0.0-rc.17 before 3.32.2.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash | 3.0.0-rc.17 < 3.32.2 | affected |
| ash-project | ash | 321f43bd05ad9544e693cbf797243693e51a6be4 < 6d2eb86ea8d2ba5ffac89c1b8b9bf46e331feabc | affected |
Weaknesses
- CWE-636: CWE-636 Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open')
ADP Enrichment
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
- SSVC:
- Exploitation: poc
- Automatable: no
- Technical Impact: partial
Additional References
References
- https://github.com/ash-project/ash/security/advisories/GHSA-3xq4-m876-fr88
- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82744.html
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82744
- https://github.com/ash-project/ash/commit/6d2eb86ea8d2ba5ffac89c1b8b9bf46e331feabc
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.