CVE-2026-80521
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
af_unix: Unlink scc_entry in unix_del_edge().
Kyle Zeng reported that GC could free a dead SCC partially.
The scenario is as follows:
Create two SCCs:
X -. A <-> B ^–'
Run the following concurrently:
2-1) send() sk-B to sk-B from sk-X 2-2) close() both A and B
At 2-1), there is a small window where unix_add_edges() publishes a new edge (B <-> B) to GC but its skb is not queued by skb_queue_tail().
If 2-2) completes before skb_queue_tail() and GC is triggered, it judges A <-> B as dead, but B is not freed because GC cannot collect the not-yet-queued skb holding the B <-> B edge.
X -. A <-> B -. This edge is visible
^--' ^..' but skb is not
This itself is not a problem since the next GC run will judge B as dead as well and free it finally.
X -. A <.> B -.
^--' ^--'
However, X's SCC forces the next GC to call unix_walk_scc_fast(), and it iterates over A through B's scc_entry.
Let's unlink scc_entry before freeing the vertex in unix_del_edge().
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 4090fa373f0e763c43610853d2774b5979915959 < e3702470ced94fad74d71e2232f022d2eb752a6d | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 4090fa373f0e763c43610853d2774b5979915959 < 594d905195024b228c962627ae5ae7c17bd582a4 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 5dfd283f4651d04dbb70ceb9ae5c4a30eda3c52a | affected |
| Linux | Linux | de7921631ff323369aa63a4324695ab54ea4047e | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.1.141 < 6.2 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.6.93 < 6.7 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.10 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 6.10 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.1.10 <= 7.1.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.2 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e3702470ced94fad74d71e2232f022d2eb752a6d
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/594d905195024b228c962627ae5ae7c17bd582a4
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.