CVE-2026-72141
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i2c: imx: fix locked bus on SMBus block-read of 0 (IRQ)
SMBus 3.1 6.5.7 allows a Block Read byte count of 0, but the interrupt-driven block-read state machine rejects it as -EPROTO. Worse, it returns without a NACK+STOP: the next receive cycle has already started, so the target keeps holding SDA and the bus stays stuck until a power cycle of this i2c controller.
Accept count=0: NACK the in-flight dummy byte (TXAK) and set msg->len to 2 so i2c_imx_isr_read_continue() emits STOP via its normal last-byte path. The dummy byte is discarded; block-read callers only consume buf[0..count-1].
Reading I2DR has likewise already armed the next byte on the count > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX error path, so NACK it (TXAK) before aborting with -EPROTO; otherwise the failing transfer's STOP cannot complete and the bus stays held.
The atomic path regressed earlier (v3.16) and is fixed separately; this patch covers only the v6.13 state-machine rework.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 5f5c2d4579ca6836f5604cca979debd68ecfe23f < 5d3240f42a667e29262aff76fdebfcdac4980626 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 5f5c2d4579ca6836f5604cca979debd68ecfe23f < 56ddfc18ea8f7d77747658892873eb632b2ed530 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 5f5c2d4579ca6836f5604cca979debd68ecfe23f < 07fd9385f0d87dff4b34f355f68adf701080cb24 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.13 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 6.13 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.18.40 <= 6.18.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.1.5 <= 7.1.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.2 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d3240f42a667e29262aff76fdebfcdac4980626
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/56ddfc18ea8f7d77747658892873eb632b2ed530
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/07fd9385f0d87dff4b34f355f68adf701080cb24
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.