CVE-2026-68438
N/A
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
smp: Make CSD lock acquisition atomic for debug mode
Commit b0473dcd4b1d ("smp: Improve smp_call_function_single() CSD-lock diagnostics") changed smp_call_function_single() so that, when CSD lock debugging is enabled, async !wait calls use the destination CPU csd_data. That improves diagnostics, but it also removes the single-writer property that made the old csd_lock() safe: multiple CPUs can now prepare the same destination CPU CSD concurrently.
csd_lock() currently waits for CSD_FLAG_LOCK to clear and then sets the bit with a non-atomic read-modify-write. Two senders can both see an unlocked CSD, set the bit, overwrite the callback fields, and enqueue the same llist node. Re-adding a node that is already the queue head can make node->next point to itself, leaving the target CPU stuck walking call_single_queue. Later synchronous work, such as a TLB shootdown, can then remain queued and trigger soft-lockup warnings or panics.
Keep the single csd_lock() implementation, but when CSD lock debugging is enabled, acquire CSD_FLAG_LOCK with try_cmpxchg_acquire(). This makes the destination CPU CSD a real atomic lock in the only configuration where it can be shared by multiple remote senders, while preserving the existing non-debug fast path.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | b0473dcd4b1d7e2e44947e7ac1820c73a268821a < 282d220bae5fbfc90cf0e3d5b5e42c00ad79f989 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | b0473dcd4b1d7e2e44947e7ac1820c73a268821a < 35551efb155e3b83445a6c3f66cb498d5efc182c | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.1 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 7.1 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.1.6 <= 7.1.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.2-rc5 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/282d220bae5fbfc90cf0e3d5b5e42c00ad79f989
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/35551efb155e3b83445a6c3f66cb498d5efc182c
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.