CVE-2026-67220
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Summary
RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, 4.3.0, When a binding is created on an x-jms-topic exchange, add_binding/3 reads the rjms_erlang_selector argument and passes it through erl_scan:string/1 then erl_parse:parse_term/1. erl_scan:string/1 interns every atom literal it tokenizes. validate_binding/2 is a no-op (-> ok.), there is no length cap, and the surrounding try/catch cannot reclaim atoms. The Java JMS client compiles selectors client-side, but the server does not enforce this , a raw AMQP client can send arbitrary selector strings. An authenticated low-privilege AMQP user confined to one vhost can crash the entire broker node (cross-tenant DoS) in <100 bind calls. Preconditions include rabbitmq_jms_topic_exchange plugin enabled (bundled; required for any JMS deployment) Authenticated AMQP user with read on an x-jms-topic exchange + write on a queue (or configure to declare both). This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, 4.3.0.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq | rabbitmq-server | >= 3.13.0, < 3.13.15 | affected |
| rabbitmq | rabbitmq-server | >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.20 | affected |
| rabbitmq | rabbitmq-server | >= 4.1.0, < 4.1.11 | affected |
| rabbitmq | rabbitmq-server | >= 4.2.0, < 4.2.6 | affected |
Weaknesses
- CWE-400: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
References
- https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-r3qr-4h63-mvj2
- https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.6
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.