CVE-2026-63838
N/A
N/A
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: rsnd: Fix potential out-of-bounds access of component_dais[]
component_dais[RSND_MAX_COMPONENT] is initially zero-initialized and later populated in rsnd_dai_of_node(). However, the existing boundary check: if (i >= RSND_MAX_COMPONENT)
does not guarantee that the last valid element remains zero. As a result, the loop can rely on component_dais[RSND_MAX_COMPONENT] being zero, which may lead to an out-of-bounds access.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 547b02f74e4ac1e7d295a6266d5bc93a647cd4ac < 9f1daac27ca28e98c8c0e4450de42bb68d547250 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 547b02f74e4ac1e7d295a6266d5bc93a647cd4ac < 15e7b2ac2455995a6af02b9d3da7a432837aaf72 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 547b02f74e4ac1e7d295a6266d5bc93a647cd4ac < 134c61925e9e9ee0f4fdbab5c3984d5bb024f5f5 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 547b02f74e4ac1e7d295a6266d5bc93a647cd4ac < a62b3e6e42359a79158c134e3cf5c74fe160c3f5 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 547b02f74e4ac1e7d295a6266d5bc93a647cd4ac < f9e437cddf6cf9e603bdaefe148c1f4792aaf39c | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.6 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 6.6 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.6.141 <= 6.6.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.12.91 <= 6.12.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.18.33 <= 6.18.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.0.10 <= 7.0.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.1 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9f1daac27ca28e98c8c0e4450de42bb68d547250
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15e7b2ac2455995a6af02b9d3da7a432837aaf72
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/134c61925e9e9ee0f4fdbab5c3984d5bb024f5f5
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a62b3e6e42359a79158c134e3cf5c74fe160c3f5
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9e437cddf6cf9e603bdaefe148c1f4792aaf39c
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.