CVE-2026-55953

Summary

The Erlang/OTP ssl TLS 1.2 (and earlier) and DTLS client does not verify that the cipher suite selected by the server in ServerHello was among the suites offered by the client in ClientHello. The client-side tls_handshake:hello/5 handler validates the negotiated protocol version and the downgrade sentinel but hands the server-chosen suite directly to ssl_handshake:handle_server_hello_extensions/9, which installs it without a membership check. The TLS 1.3 client path performs this check (per RFC 8446), so it is not affected.

An on-path attacker between the client and the intended server can respond with a ServerHello selecting an anonymous key exchange suite such as TLS_DH_anon_* or TLS_ECDH_anon_* that the client never offered. Anonymous suites do not require the server to present a certificate, so the entire verify_peer and cacerts configuration is bypassed: the attacker completes the handshake with its own ephemeral parameters, no certificate is validated, no hostname is checked, and ssl:connect returns {ok, Socket}. All subsequent application traffic is readable and modifiable by the attacker.

This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 29.0.4, OTP 28.5.0.4 and OTP 27.3.4.15, corresponding to ssl from 5.3.4 before 11.7.4, 11.6.0.4 and 11.2.12.11.

Affected Software

VendorProductVersion RangeStatus
ErlangOTP5.3.4 < *affected
ErlangOTP17.0 < *affected
ErlangOTP84adefa331c4159d432d22840663c38f155cd4c1 < *affected

Weaknesses

  • CWE-757: CWE-757 Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation ('Algorithm Downgrade')

Workarounds

  • Restrict client connections to TLS 1.3 only by setting versions to ['tlsv1.3'] in the client's ssl options. The TLS 1.3 client path performs the required cipher suite membership check and is not affected.

ADP Enrichment

CISA ADP Vulnrichment

  • SSVC:
  • Exploitation: none
    • Automatable: no
    • Technical Impact: total

References