CVE-2026-45988
9.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rxrpc: Fix re-decryption of RESPONSE packets
If a RESPONSE packet gets a temporary failure during processing, it may end up in a partially decrypted state - and then get requeued for a retry.
Fix this by just discarding the packet; we will send another CHALLENGE packet and thereby elicit a further response. Similarly, discard an incoming CHALLENGE packet if we get an error whilst generating a RESPONSE; the server will send another CHALLENGE.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 17926a79320afa9b95df6b977b40cca6d8713cea < d61482be4aae1835b78875761206241835a7510e | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 17926a79320afa9b95df6b977b40cca6d8713cea < 7b89868305052b94a91b708c462bc2281fa42a4a | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 17926a79320afa9b95df6b977b40cca6d8713cea < 76cb9a2d252274adfae6e293a292434631a7d472 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 17926a79320afa9b95df6b977b40cca6d8713cea < f55b383070170e988e4dec28be2af1714d258521 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 17926a79320afa9b95df6b977b40cca6d8713cea < 0422e7a4883f25101903f3e8105c0808aa5f4ce9 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 2.6.22 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 2.6.22 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.6.140 <= 6.6.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.12.86 <= 6.12.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.18.27 <= 6.18.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.0.4 <= 7.0.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.1 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d61482be4aae1835b78875761206241835a7510e
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b89868305052b94a91b708c462bc2281fa42a4a
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/76cb9a2d252274adfae6e293a292434631a7d472
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f55b383070170e988e4dec28be2af1714d258521
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0422e7a4883f25101903f3e8105c0808aa5f4ce9
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.