CVE-2026-43245
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ntfs: ->d_compare() must not block
… so don't use __getname() there. Switch it (and ntfs_d_hash(), while we are at it) to kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_NOWAIT). Yes, ntfs_d_hash() almost certainly can do with smaller allocations, but let ntfs folks deal with that - keep the allocation size as-is for now.
Stop abusing names_cachep in ntfs, period - various uses of that thing in there have nothing to do with pathnames; just use k[mz]alloc() and be done with that. For now let's keep sizes as-in, but AFAICS none of the users actually want PATH_MAX.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | a3a956c78efaa202b1d75190136671cf6e87bfbe < 02ecc0978c459fd90bb24b2a946dd16d43e68fe5 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | a3a956c78efaa202b1d75190136671cf6e87bfbe < 1be7ca86ce1794d966fda5d82181bc978b150fbc | affected |
| Linux | Linux | a3a956c78efaa202b1d75190136671cf6e87bfbe < 142c444a395f4d26055c8a4473e228bb86283f1e | affected |
| Linux | Linux | a3a956c78efaa202b1d75190136671cf6e87bfbe < fb4b1f969ba01fa1d4088467a02fc1e5f0806710 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | a3a956c78efaa202b1d75190136671cf6e87bfbe < ca2a04e84af79596e5cd9cfe697d5122ec39c8ce | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.2 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 6.2 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.6.141 <= 6.6.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.12.91 <= 6.12.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.18.16 <= 6.18.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.19.6 <= 6.19.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.0 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/02ecc0978c459fd90bb24b2a946dd16d43e68fe5
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1be7ca86ce1794d966fda5d82181bc978b150fbc
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/142c444a395f4d26055c8a4473e228bb86283f1e
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fb4b1f969ba01fa1d4088467a02fc1e5f0806710
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca2a04e84af79596e5cd9cfe697d5122ec39c8ce
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.