CVE-2026-42791
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N
Summary
Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_ocsp module) allows forged OCSP responses signed with an expired responder certificate to be accepted as valid.
OCSP response verification in pubkey_ocsp:verify_response/5 and pubkey_ocsp:is_authorized_responder/3 in lib/public_key/src/pubkey_ocsp.erl does not check the validity period (notBefore/notAfter) of the OCSP responder certificate. An attacker who has obtained the private key of an expired CA-designated OCSP responder certificate can forge OCSP responses that Erlang/OTP accepts as valid.
This affects TLS clients using OCSP stapling via the ssl application: a malicious or compromised server can present a revoked TLS certificate together with a forged OCSP response signed by an expired responder key, and the client will accept the revoked certificate as valid. It also affects applications calling public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 directly, where the impact depends on the use case — server-side client certificate validation using this API may allow authentication bypass with a revoked client certificate.
This issue affects OTP from OTP 27.0 before OTP 27.3.4.12, 28.5.0.1, and 29.0.1 corresponding to public_key from 1.16 before 1.17.1.3, 1.20.3.1, and 1.21.1.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Erlang | OTP | 1.16 < * | affected |
| Erlang | OTP | 27.0 < * | affected |
| Erlang | OTP | 2b1a742c651b90f8a7a1fb2ddde73f29915ea376 < * | affected |
Weaknesses
- CWE-295: CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
- CWE-672: CWE-672 Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release
Workarounds
- For TLS clients using the ssl application, disable OCSP stapling by setting {stapling, no_staple} in the client options, or switch to CRL-based revocation checking with {crl_check, true}.
- For applications calling public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 directly, validate the responder certificate's validity period in application code before calling the function.
ADP Enrichment
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
- SSVC:
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: no
- Technical Impact: partial
References
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-cjxj-wj6x-3fff
- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-42791.html
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-42791
- https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/7995f1fdaee3da569bb810358ce0f546471d169b
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/b3870e02405c709a872b01ba6086065620cdfe76
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.