CVE-2026-31639
N/A
N/A
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rxrpc: Fix key reference count leak from call->key
When creating a client call in rxrpc_alloc_client_call(), the code obtains a reference to the key. This is never cleaned up and gets leaked when the call is destroyed.
Fix this by freeing call->key in rxrpc_destroy_call().
Before the patch, it shows the key reference counter elevated:
$ cat /proc/keys | grep afs@54321 1bffe9cd I–Q–i 8053480 4169w 3b010000 1000 1000 rxrpc afs@54321: ka $
After the patch, the invalidated key is removed when the code exits:
$ cat /proc/keys | grep afs@54321 $
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | f3441d4125fc98995858550a5521b8d7daf0504a < f1a7a3ab0f35f83cf11bba906b9e948cf3788c28 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | f3441d4125fc98995858550a5521b8d7daf0504a < e6b7943c5dc875647499da09bf4d50a8557ab0c3 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | f3441d4125fc98995858550a5521b8d7daf0504a < 2e6ef713b1598f6acd7f302fa6b12b6731c89914 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | f3441d4125fc98995858550a5521b8d7daf0504a < 978108902ee4ef2b348ff7ec36ad014dc5bc6dc6 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | f3441d4125fc98995858550a5521b8d7daf0504a < d666540d217e8d420544ebdfbadeedd623562733 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.2 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 6.2 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.6.135 <= 6.6.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.12.82 <= 6.12.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.18.23 <= 6.18.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.19.13 <= 6.19.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.0 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1a7a3ab0f35f83cf11bba906b9e948cf3788c28
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e6b7943c5dc875647499da09bf4d50a8557ab0c3
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2e6ef713b1598f6acd7f302fa6b12b6731c89914
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/978108902ee4ef2b348ff7ec36ad014dc5bc6dc6
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d666540d217e8d420544ebdfbadeedd623562733
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.