CVE-2026-23285
N/A
N/A
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drbd: fix null-pointer dereference on local read error
In drbd_request_endio(), READ_COMPLETED_WITH_ERROR is passed to __req_mod() with a NULL peer_device:
__req_mod(req, what, NULL, &m);
The READ_COMPLETED_WITH_ERROR handler then unconditionally passes this NULL peer_device to drbd_set_out_of_sync(), which dereferences it, causing a null-pointer dereference.
Fix this by obtaining the peer_device via first_peer_device(device), matching how drbd_req_destroy() handles the same situation.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 0d11f3cf279c5ad20a41f29242f170ba3c02f2da < 6f1d1614f841d91a4169db65812ffd1271735b42 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0d11f3cf279c5ad20a41f29242f170ba3c02f2da < 1e906c08594c8f9a6a524f38ede2c4e051196106 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0d11f3cf279c5ad20a41f29242f170ba3c02f2da < 4e8935053ba389ae8d6685c10854d8021931bd89 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0d11f3cf279c5ad20a41f29242f170ba3c02f2da < 91df51d2df0ca4fd3281f73626341563d64a98a5 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0d11f3cf279c5ad20a41f29242f170ba3c02f2da < 0d195d3b205ca90db30d70d09d7bb6909aac178f | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.4 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 6.4 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.6.130 <= 6.6.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.12.77 <= 6.12.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.18.17 <= 6.18.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.19.7 <= 6.19.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.0 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f1d1614f841d91a4169db65812ffd1271735b42
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1e906c08594c8f9a6a524f38ede2c4e051196106
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e8935053ba389ae8d6685c10854d8021931bd89
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/91df51d2df0ca4fd3281f73626341563d64a98a5
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d195d3b205ca90db30d70d09d7bb6909aac178f
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.