CVE-2026-23267
N/A
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix IS_CHECKPOINTED flag inconsistency issue caused by concurrent atomic commit and checkpoint writes
During SPO tests, when mounting F2FS, an -EINVAL error was returned from f2fs_recover_inode_page. The issue occurred under the following scenario
Thread A Thread B f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write
- f2fs_do_sync_file // atomic = true
- f2fs_fsync_node_pages
- last_folio = inode folio
- schedule before folio_lock(last_folio) f2fs_write_checkpoint - block_operations// writeback last_folio - schedule before f2fs_flush_nat_entries
- set_fsync_mark(last_folio, 1)
- set_dentry_mark(last_folio, 1)
- folio_mark_dirty(last_folio)
- __write_node_folio(last_folio)
- f2fs_down_read(&sbi->node_write)//block - f2fs_flush_nat_entries : {struct nat_entry}->flag |= BIT(IS_CHECKPOINTED) - unblock_operations : f2fs_up_write(&sbi->node_write) f2fs_write_checkpoint//return
- f2fs_do_write_node_page() f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write//return SPO
Thread A calls f2fs_need_dentry_mark(sbi, ino), and the last_folio has already been written once. However, the {struct nat_entry}->flag did not have the IS_CHECKPOINTED set, causing set_dentry_mark(last_folio, 1) and write last_folio again after Thread B finishes f2fs_write_checkpoint.
After SPO and reboot, it was detected that {struct node_info}->blk_addr was not NULL_ADDR because Thread B successfully write the checkpoint.
This issue only occurs in atomic write scenarios. For regular file fsync operations, the folio must be dirty. If block_operations->f2fs_sync_node_pages successfully submit the folio write, this path will not be executed. Otherwise, the f2fs_write_checkpoint will need to wait for the folio write submission to complete, as sbi->nr_pages[F2FS_DIRTY_NODES] > 0. Therefore, the situation where f2fs_need_dentry_mark checks that the {struct nat_entry}->flag /wo the IS_CHECKPOINTED flag, but the folio write has already been submitted, will not occur.
Therefore, for atomic file fsync, sbi->node_write should be acquired through __write_node_folio to ensure that the IS_CHECKPOINTED flag correctly indicates that the checkpoint write has been completed.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 608514deba38c8611ad330d6a3c8e2b9a1f68e4b < 32bc3c9fe18881d50dd51fd5f26d19fe1190dc0d | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 608514deba38c8611ad330d6a3c8e2b9a1f68e4b < 75e19da068adf0dc5dd269dd157392434b9117d4 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 608514deba38c8611ad330d6a3c8e2b9a1f68e4b < 962c167b0f262b9962207fbeaa531721d55ea00e | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 608514deba38c8611ad330d6a3c8e2b9a1f68e4b < bd66b4c487d5091d2a65d6089e0de36f0c26a4c7 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 608514deba38c8611ad330d6a3c8e2b9a1f68e4b < ed81bc5885460905f9160e7b463e5708fd056324 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 608514deba38c8611ad330d6a3c8e2b9a1f68e4b < 7633a7387eb4d0259d6bea945e1d3469cd135bbc | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 4.7 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 4.7 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.1.164 <= 6.1.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.6.127 <= 6.6.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.12.74 <= 6.12.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.18.13 <= 6.18.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.19.3 <= 6.19.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 7.0 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/32bc3c9fe18881d50dd51fd5f26d19fe1190dc0d
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/75e19da068adf0dc5dd269dd157392434b9117d4
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/962c167b0f262b9962207fbeaa531721d55ea00e
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bd66b4c487d5091d2a65d6089e0de36f0c26a4c7
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ed81bc5885460905f9160e7b463e5708fd056324
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7633a7387eb4d0259d6bea945e1d3469cd135bbc
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.