CVE-2025-38653
N/A
N/A
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
proc: use the same treatment to check proc_lseek as ones for proc_read_iter et.al
Check pde->proc_ops->proc_lseek directly may cause UAF in rmmod scenario. It's a gap in proc_reg_open() after commit 654b33ada4ab("proc: fix UAF in proc_get_inode()"). Followed by AI Viro's suggestion, fix it in same manner.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 3f61631d47f115b83c935d0039f95cb68b0c8ab7 < c35b0feb80b48720dfbbf4e33759c7be3faaebb6 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 3f61631d47f115b83c935d0039f95cb68b0c8ab7 < 33c778ea0bd0fa62ff590497e72562ff90f82b13 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 3f61631d47f115b83c935d0039f95cb68b0c8ab7 < fc1072d934f687e1221d685cf1a49a5068318f34 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 3f61631d47f115b83c935d0039f95cb68b0c8ab7 < d136502e04d8853a9aecb335d07bbefd7a1519a8 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 3f61631d47f115b83c935d0039f95cb68b0c8ab7 < 1fccbfbae1dd36198dc47feac696563244ad81d3 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 3f61631d47f115b83c935d0039f95cb68b0c8ab7 < ff7ec8dc1b646296f8d94c39339e8d3833d16c05 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.0 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 6.0 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.1.148 <= 6.1.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.6.102 <= 6.6.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.12.42 <= 6.12.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.15.10 <= 6.15.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.16.1 <= 6.16.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.17 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
ADP Enrichment
CVE Program Container
Additional References
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c35b0feb80b48720dfbbf4e33759c7be3faaebb6
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33c778ea0bd0fa62ff590497e72562ff90f82b13
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fc1072d934f687e1221d685cf1a49a5068318f34
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d136502e04d8853a9aecb335d07bbefd7a1519a8
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1fccbfbae1dd36198dc47feac696563244ad81d3
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff7ec8dc1b646296f8d94c39339e8d3833d16c05
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.