CVE-2025-38001

Summary

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net_sched: hfsc: Address reentrant enqueue adding class to eltree twice

Savino says: "We are writing to report that this recent patch (141d34391abbb315d68556b7c67ad97885407547) [1] can be bypassed, and a UAF can still occur when HFSC is utilized with NETEM.

The patch only checks the cl->cl_nactive field to determine whether
it is the first insertion or not [2], but this field is only
incremented by init_vf [3].

By using HFSC_RSC (which uses init_ed) [4], it is possible to bypass the
check and insert the class twice in the eltree.
Under normal conditions, this would lead to an infinite loop in
hfsc_dequeue for the reasons we already explained in this report [5].

However, if TBF is added as root qdisc and it is configured with a
very low rate,
it can be utilized to prevent packets from being dequeued.
This behavior can be exploited to perform subsequent insertions in the
HFSC eltree and cause a UAF."

To fix both the UAF and the infinite loop, with netem as an hfsc child, check explicitly in hfsc_enqueue whether the class is already in the eltree whenever the HFSC_RSC flag is set.

[1] https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=141d34391abbb315d68556b7c67ad97885407547 [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15-rc5/source/net/sched/sch_hfsc.c#L1572 [3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15-rc5/source/net/sched/sch_hfsc.c#L677 [4] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15-rc5/source/net/sched/sch_hfsc.c#L1574 [5] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/8DuRWwfqjoRDLDmBMlIfbrsZg9Gx50DHJc1ilxsEBNe2D6NMoigR_eIRIG0LOjMc3r10nUUZtArXx4oZBIdUfZQrwjcQhdinnMis_0G7VEk=@willsroot.io/T/#u

Affected Software

VendorProductVersion RangeStatus
LinuxLinux37d9cf1a3ce35de3df6f7d209bfb1f50cf188cea < e5bee633cc276410337d54b99f77fbc1ad8801e5affected
LinuxLinux37d9cf1a3ce35de3df6f7d209bfb1f50cf188cea < 6672e6c00810056acaac019fe26cdc26fee8a66caffected
LinuxLinux37d9cf1a3ce35de3df6f7d209bfb1f50cf188cea < 2c928b3a0b04a431ffcd6c8b7d88a267124a3a28affected
LinuxLinux37d9cf1a3ce35de3df6f7d209bfb1f50cf188cea < a0ec22fa20b252edbe070a9de8501eef63c17ef5affected
LinuxLinux37d9cf1a3ce35de3df6f7d209bfb1f50cf188cea < 295f7c579b07b5b7cf2dffe485f71cc2f27647cbaffected
LinuxLinux37d9cf1a3ce35de3df6f7d209bfb1f50cf188cea < 2f2190ce4ca972051cac6a8d7937448f8cb9673caffected
LinuxLinux37d9cf1a3ce35de3df6f7d209bfb1f50cf188cea < 4e38eaaabfb7fffbb371a51150203e19eee5d70eaffected
LinuxLinux37d9cf1a3ce35de3df6f7d209bfb1f50cf188cea < 39ed887b1dd2d6b720f87e86692ac3006cc111c8affected
LinuxLinux37d9cf1a3ce35de3df6f7d209bfb1f50cf188cea < ac9fe7dd8e730a103ae4481147395cc73492d786affected
LinuxLinux5.0affected
LinuxLinux0 < 5.0unaffected
LinuxLinux5.4.294 <= 5.4.*unaffected
LinuxLinux5.10.238 <= 5.10.*unaffected
LinuxLinux5.15.185 <= 5.15.*unaffected
LinuxLinux6.1.141 <= 6.1.*unaffected
LinuxLinux6.6.93 <= 6.6.*unaffected
LinuxLinux6.12.32 <= 6.12.*unaffected
LinuxLinux6.14.10 <= 6.14.*unaffected
LinuxLinux6.15.1 <= 6.15.*unaffected
LinuxLinux6.16 <= *unaffected

Weaknesses

ADP Enrichment

CVE Program Container

Additional References

References