CVE-2025-26597
7.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
A buffer overflow flaw was found in X.Org and Xwayland. If XkbChangeTypesOfKey() is called with a 0 group, it will resize the key symbols table to 0 but leave the key actions unchanged. If the same function is later called with a non-zero value of groups, this will cause a buffer overflow because the key actions are of the wrong size.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
0 < 21.1.16 | affected | ||
22.0.0 < 24.1.6 | affected | ||
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | 0:24.1.5-3.el10_0 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Extended Lifecycle Support - EXTENSION | 0:1.1.0-25.el6_10 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support | 0:1.8.0-36.el7_9 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support | 0:1.20.4-30.el7_9 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | 0:1.13.1-15.el8_10 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support | 0:1.9.0-15.el8_2.13 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support | 0:1.11.0-8.el8_4.12 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Telecommunications Update Service | 0:1.11.0-8.el8_4.12 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Update Services for SAP Solutions | 0:1.11.0-8.el8_4.12 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support | 0:1.12.0-6.el8_6.13 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service | 0:1.12.0-6.el8_6.13 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions | 0:1.12.0-6.el8_6.13 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support | 0:1.12.0-15.el8_8.12 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | 0:1.14.1-1.el9_5.1 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | 0:1.20.11-28.el9_6 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | 0:23.2.7-3.el9_6 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions | 0:1.11.0-22.el9_0.13 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support | 0:1.12.0-14.el9_2.10 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support | 0:1.13.1-8.el9_4.5 < * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
- CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
Workarounds
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options don't meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
ADP Enrichment
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
- SSVC:
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: no
- Technical Impact: total
CVE Program Container
Additional References
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/02/msg00036.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/06/02/1
References
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2500
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2502
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2861
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2862
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2865
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2866
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2873
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2874
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2875
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2879
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2880
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3976
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:7163
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:7165
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:7458
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-26597
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2345255
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.