CVE-2024-50195
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
posix-clock: Fix missing timespec64 check in pc_clock_settime()
As Andrew pointed out, it will make sense that the PTP core checked timespec64 struct's tv_sec and tv_nsec range before calling ptp->info->settime64().
As the man manual of clock_settime() said, if tp.tv_sec is negative or tp.tv_nsec is outside the range [0..999,999,999], it should return EINVAL, which include dynamic clocks which handles PTP clock, and the condition is consistent with timespec64_valid(). As Thomas suggested, timespec64_valid() only check the timespec is valid, but not ensure that the time is in a valid range, so check it ahead using timespec64_valid_strict() in pc_clock_settime() and return -EINVAL if not valid.
There are some drivers that use tp->tv_sec and tp->tv_nsec directly to write registers without validity checks and assume that the higher layer has checked it, which is dangerous and will benefit from this, such as hclge_ptp_settime(), igb_ptp_settime_i210(), _rcar_gen4_ptp_settime(), and some drivers can remove the checks of itself.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 0606f422b453f76c31ab2b1bd52943ff06a2dcf2 < 29f085345cde24566efb751f39e5d367c381c584 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0606f422b453f76c31ab2b1bd52943ff06a2dcf2 < e0c966bd3e31911b57ef76cec4c5796ebd88e512 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0606f422b453f76c31ab2b1bd52943ff06a2dcf2 < 673a1c5a2998acbd429d6286e6cad10f17f4f073 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0606f422b453f76c31ab2b1bd52943ff06a2dcf2 < c8789fbe2bbf75845e45302cba6ffa44e1884d01 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0606f422b453f76c31ab2b1bd52943ff06a2dcf2 < 27abbde44b6e71ee3891de13e1a228aa7ce95bfe | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0606f422b453f76c31ab2b1bd52943ff06a2dcf2 < a3f169e398215e71361774d13bf91a0101283ac2 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0606f422b453f76c31ab2b1bd52943ff06a2dcf2 < 1ff7247101af723731ea42ed565d54fb8f341264 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0606f422b453f76c31ab2b1bd52943ff06a2dcf2 < d8794ac20a299b647ba9958f6d657051fc51a540 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 2.6.39 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 2.6.39 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 4.19.323 <= 4.19.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 5.4.285 <= 5.4.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 5.10.228 <= 5.10.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 5.15.169 <= 5.15.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.1.114 <= 6.1.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.6.58 <= 6.6.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.11.5 <= 6.11.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.12 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
ADP Enrichment
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
- SSVC:
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: no
- Technical Impact: partial
CVE Program Container
Additional References
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00002.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/29f085345cde24566efb751f39e5d367c381c584
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e0c966bd3e31911b57ef76cec4c5796ebd88e512
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/673a1c5a2998acbd429d6286e6cad10f17f4f073
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c8789fbe2bbf75845e45302cba6ffa44e1884d01
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/27abbde44b6e71ee3891de13e1a228aa7ce95bfe
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a3f169e398215e71361774d13bf91a0101283ac2
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1ff7247101af723731ea42ed565d54fb8f341264
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8794ac20a299b647ba9958f6d657051fc51a540
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.