CVE-2024-50087
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix uninitialized pointer free on read_alloc_one_name() error
The function read_alloc_one_name() does not initialize the name field of the passed fscrypt_str struct if kmalloc fails to allocate the corresponding buffer. Thus, it is not guaranteed that fscrypt_str.name is initialized when freeing it.
This is a follow-up to the linked patch that fixes the remaining instances of the bug introduced by commit e43eec81c516 ("btrfs: use struct qstr instead of name and namelen pairs").
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 1cf474cd474bc5d3ef63086ffd009a87a5b7bb2e < b37de9491f140a0ff125c27dd1050185c3accbc1 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | e43eec81c5167b655b72c781b0e75e62a05e415e < 7fc7c47b9ba0cf2d192f2117a64b24881b0b577f | affected |
| Linux | Linux | e43eec81c5167b655b72c781b0e75e62a05e415e < 1ec28de5e476913ae51f909660b4447eddb28838 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | e43eec81c5167b655b72c781b0e75e62a05e415e < 2ab5e243c2266c841e0f6904fad1514b18eaf510 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.1.57 < 6.1.114 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.2 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 6.2 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.1.114 <= 6.1.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.6.58 <= 6.6.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.11.5 <= 6.11.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.12 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
ADP Enrichment
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
- SSVC:
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: no
- Technical Impact: partial
CVE Program Container
Additional References
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b37de9491f140a0ff125c27dd1050185c3accbc1
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7fc7c47b9ba0cf2d192f2117a64b24881b0b577f
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1ec28de5e476913ae51f909660b4447eddb28838
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ab5e243c2266c841e0f6904fad1514b18eaf510
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.