CVE-2024-39506
N/A
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
liquidio: Adjust a NULL pointer handling path in lio_vf_rep_copy_packet
In lio_vf_rep_copy_packet() pg_info->page is compared to a NULL value, but then it is unconditionally passed to skb_add_rx_frag() which looks strange and could lead to null pointer dereference.
lio_vf_rep_copy_packet() call trace looks like: octeon_droq_process_packets octeon_droq_fast_process_packets octeon_droq_dispatch_pkt octeon_create_recv_info …search in the dispatch_list… ->disp_fn(rdisp->rinfo, …) lio_vf_rep_pkt_recv(struct octeon_recv_info *recv_info, …) In this path there is no code which sets pg_info->page to NULL. So this check looks unneeded and doesn't solve potential problem. But I guess the author had reason to add a check and I have no such card and can't do real test. In addition, the code in the function liquidio_push_packet() in liquidio/lio_core.c does exactly the same.
Based on this, I consider the most acceptable compromise solution to adjust this issue by moving skb_add_rx_frag() into conditional scope.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 1f233f327913f3dee0602cba9c64df1903772b55 < 87d6bdc006f0cbf297a3b2ad6e40ede4c3ee5dc2 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 1f233f327913f3dee0602cba9c64df1903772b55 < dcc7440f32c7a26b067aff6e7d931ec593024a79 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 1f233f327913f3dee0602cba9c64df1903772b55 < cbf18d8128a753cb632bef39470d19befd9c7347 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 1f233f327913f3dee0602cba9c64df1903772b55 < a86490a3712cc513113440a606a0e77130abd47c | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 1f233f327913f3dee0602cba9c64df1903772b55 < f1ab15a09492a5ae8ab1e2c35ba2cf9e150d25ee | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 1f233f327913f3dee0602cba9c64df1903772b55 < fd2b613bc4c508e55c1221c6595bb889812a4fea | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 1f233f327913f3dee0602cba9c64df1903772b55 < a6f4d0ec170a46b5f453cacf55dff5989b42bbfa | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 1f233f327913f3dee0602cba9c64df1903772b55 < c44711b78608c98a3e6b49ce91678cd0917d5349 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 4.15 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 4.15 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 4.19.317 <= 4.19.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 5.4.279 <= 5.4.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 5.10.221 <= 5.10.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 5.15.162 <= 5.15.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.1.95 <= 6.1.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.6.35 <= 6.6.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.9.6 <= 6.9.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.10 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
ADP Enrichment
CVE Program Container
Additional References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87d6bdc006f0cbf297a3b2ad6e40ede4c3ee5dc2
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dcc7440f32c7a26b067aff6e7d931ec593024a79
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbf18d8128a753cb632bef39470d19befd9c7347
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a86490a3712cc513113440a606a0e77130abd47c
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1ab15a09492a5ae8ab1e2c35ba2cf9e150d25ee
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fd2b613bc4c508e55c1221c6595bb889812a4fea
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6f4d0ec170a46b5f453cacf55dff5989b42bbfa
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c44711b78608c98a3e6b49ce91678cd0917d5349
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
- SSVC:
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: no
- Technical Impact: partial
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87d6bdc006f0cbf297a3b2ad6e40ede4c3ee5dc2
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dcc7440f32c7a26b067aff6e7d931ec593024a79
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbf18d8128a753cb632bef39470d19befd9c7347
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a86490a3712cc513113440a606a0e77130abd47c
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1ab15a09492a5ae8ab1e2c35ba2cf9e150d25ee
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fd2b613bc4c508e55c1221c6595bb889812a4fea
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6f4d0ec170a46b5f453cacf55dff5989b42bbfa
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c44711b78608c98a3e6b49ce91678cd0917d5349
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.