CVE-2024-26951
N/A
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wireguard: netlink: check for dangling peer via is_dead instead of empty list
If all peers are removed via wg_peer_remove_all(), rather than setting peer_list to empty, the peer is added to a temporary list with a head on the stack of wg_peer_remove_all(). If a netlink dump is resumed and the cursored peer is one that has been removed via wg_peer_remove_all(), it will iterate from that peer and then attempt to dump freed peers.
Fix this by instead checking peer->is_dead, which was explictly created for this purpose. Also move up the device_update_lock lockdep assertion, since reading is_dead relies on that.
It can be reproduced by a small script like:
echo "Setting config..."
ip link add dev wg0 type wireguard
wg setconf wg0 /big-config
(
while true; do
echo "Showing config..."
wg showconf wg0 > /dev/null
done
) &
sleep 4
wg setconf wg0 <(printf "[Peer]\nPublicKey=$(wg genkey)\n")
Resulting in:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x182a/0x1b20
Read of size 8 at addr ffff88811956ec70 by task wg/59
CPU: 2 PID: 59 Comm: wg Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-debug+ #5
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x70
print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x380
print_report+0xab/0x250
kasan_report+0xba/0xf0
__lock_acquire+0x182a/0x1b20
lock_acquire+0x191/0x4b0
down_read+0x80/0x440
get_peer+0x140/0xcb0
wg_get_device_dump+0x471/0x1130
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd < f52be46e3e6ecefc2539119784324f0cbc09620a | affected |
| Linux | Linux | e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd < 710a177f347282eea162aec8712beb1f42d5ad87 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd < b7cea3a9af0853fdbb1b16633a458f991dde6aac | affected |
| Linux | Linux | e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd < 13d107794304306164481d31ce33f8fdb25a9c04 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd < 7bedfe4cfa38771840a355970e4437cd52d4046b | affected |
| Linux | Linux | e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd < 302b2dfc013baca3dea7ceda383930d9297d231d | affected |
| Linux | Linux | e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd < 55b6c738673871c9b0edae05d0c97995c1ff08c4 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 5.6 | affected |
| Linux | Linux | 0 < 5.6 | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 5.10.215 <= 5.10.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 5.15.154 <= 5.15.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.1.84 <= 6.1.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.6.24 <= 6.6.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.7.12 <= 6.7.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.8.3 <= 6.8.* | unaffected |
| Linux | Linux | 6.9 <= * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
ADP Enrichment
CVE Program Container
Additional References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f52be46e3e6ecefc2539119784324f0cbc09620a
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/710a177f347282eea162aec8712beb1f42d5ad87
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b7cea3a9af0853fdbb1b16633a458f991dde6aac
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/13d107794304306164481d31ce33f8fdb25a9c04
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7bedfe4cfa38771840a355970e4437cd52d4046b
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/302b2dfc013baca3dea7ceda383930d9297d231d
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55b6c738673871c9b0edae05d0c97995c1ff08c4
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00017.html
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
- SSVC:
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: no
- Technical Impact: partial
Additional References
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f52be46e3e6ecefc2539119784324f0cbc09620a
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/710a177f347282eea162aec8712beb1f42d5ad87
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b7cea3a9af0853fdbb1b16633a458f991dde6aac
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/13d107794304306164481d31ce33f8fdb25a9c04
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7bedfe4cfa38771840a355970e4437cd52d4046b
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/302b2dfc013baca3dea7ceda383930d9297d231d
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55b6c738673871c9b0edae05d0c97995c1ff08c4
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.