CVE-2024-0553
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Summary
A vulnerability was found in GnuTLS. The response times to malformed ciphertexts in RSA-PSK ClientKeyExchange differ from the response times of ciphertexts with correct PKCS#1 v1.5 padding. This issue may allow a remote attacker to perform a timing side-channel attack in the RSA-PSK key exchange, potentially leading to the leakage of sensitive data. CVE-2024-0553 is designated as an incomplete resolution for CVE-2023-5981.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
3.8.0 < 3.8.3 | affected | ||
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | 0:3.6.16-8.el8_9.1 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | 0:3.6.16-8.el8_9.1 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support | 0:3.6.16-5.el8_6.3 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support | 0:3.6.16-7.el8_8.2 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support | 0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.2 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-37 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-68 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-158 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-39 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-58 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-158 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-13 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-81 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-158 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-79 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-22 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-57 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-6 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-158 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-15 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-15 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-54 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-158 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-10 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-26 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-158 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-19 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-158 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-158 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-21 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | v4.15.0-103 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v5.8.6-22 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v5.8.6-11 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v6.8.1-407 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v5.8.6-19 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v1.0.0-479 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v5.8.6-7 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v0.4.0-247 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v5.8.6-5 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v1.1.0-227 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v5.8.1-470 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v2.9.6-14 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v5.8.6-2 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v5.8.6-24 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v5.8.6-10 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v0.1.0-525 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v0.1.0-224 < * | unaffected |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | v0.28.1-56 < * | unaffected |
Weaknesses
- CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy
Workarounds
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options don't meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
ADP Enrichment
CVE Program Container
Additional References
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/01/19/3
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0533
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0627
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0796
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1082
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1108
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1383
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2094
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-0553
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258412
- https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1522
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/02/msg00010.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7ZEIOLORQ7N6WRPFXZSYDL2MC4LP7VFV/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GNXKVR5YNUEBNHAHM5GSYKBZX4W2HMN2/
- https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-help/2024-January/004841.html
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240202-0011/
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
- SSVC:
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: yes
- Technical Impact: partial
References
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0533
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0627
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0796
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1082
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1108
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1383
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2094
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-0553
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258412
- https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1522
- https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-help/2024-January/004841.html
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.