CVE-2021-25214
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
In BIND 9.8.5 -> 9.8.8, 9.9.3 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.11 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, when a vulnerable version of named receives a malformed IXFR triggering the flaw described above, the named process will terminate due to a failed assertion the next time the transferred secondary zone is refreshed.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISC | BIND9 | Open Source Branch 9.8 9.8.5 through 9.8.8 | affected |
| ISC | BIND9 | Open Source Branches 9.9 through 9.11 9.9.3 through versions before 9.11.30 | affected |
| ISC | BIND9 | Open Source Branches 9.12 through 9.16 9.12.0 through versions before 9.16.14 | affected |
| ISC | BIND9 | Supported Preview Branches 9.9-S through 9.11-S 9.9.3-S1 through versions before 9.11.30-S1 | affected |
| ISC | BIND9 | Supported Preview Branch 9.16-S 9.16.8-S1 through versions before 9.16.14-S1 | affected |
| ISC | BIND9 | Development Branch 9.17 9.17.0 through versiosn before 9.17.12 | affected |
Weaknesses
- Incremental zone transfers (IXFR) provide a way of transferring changed portion(s) of a zone between servers. An IXFR stream containing SOA records with an owner name other than the transferred zone's apex may cause the receiving named server to inadvertently remove the SOA record for the zone in question from the zone database. This leads to an assertion failure when the next SOA refresh query for that zone is made. Affects BIND 9.8.5 -> 9.8.8, 9.9.3 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.11 of the BIND 9.17 development branch.
Workarounds
Disabling incremental zone transfers (IXFR) by setting request-ixfr no; in the desired configuration block (options, zone, or server) prevents the failing assertion from being evaluated.
ADP Enrichment
CVE Program Container
Additional References
- https://kb.isc.org/v1/docs/cve-2021-25214
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/4
- https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4909
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/05/msg00001.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VEC2XG4Q2ODTN2C4CGXEIXU3EUTBMK7L/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZDSRPCJQ7MZC6CENH5PO3VQOFI7VSWBE/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210521-0006/
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
References
- https://kb.isc.org/v1/docs/cve-2021-25214
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/4
- https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4909
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/05/msg00001.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VEC2XG4Q2ODTN2C4CGXEIXU3EUTBMK7L/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZDSRPCJQ7MZC6CENH5PO3VQOFI7VSWBE/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210521-0006/
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.