CVE-2020-8617
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
Using a specially-crafted message, an attacker may potentially cause a BIND server to reach an inconsistent state if the attacker knows (or successfully guesses) the name of a TSIG key used by the server. Since BIND, by default, configures a local session key even on servers whose configuration does not otherwise make use of it, almost all current BIND servers are vulnerable. In releases of BIND dating from March 2018 and after, an assertion check in tsig.c detects this inconsistent state and deliberately exits. Prior to the introduction of the check the server would continue operating in an inconsistent state, with potentially harmful results.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISC | BIND9 | 9.0.0 -> 9.11.18, 9.12.0 -> 9.12.4-P2, 9.14.0 -> 9.14.11, 9.16.0 -> 9.16.2, and releases 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the 9.17 experimental development branch. All releases in the obsolete 9.13 and 9.15 development branches. All releases of BIND Supported Preview Edition from 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.18-S1 | affected |
Weaknesses
- An error in BIND code which checks the validity of messages containing TSIG resource records can be exploited by an attacker to trigger an assertion failure in tsig.c, resulting in denial of service to clients. BIND 9.0.0 -> 9.11.18, 9.12.0 -> 9.12.4-P2, 9.14.0 -> 9.14.11, 9.16.0 -> 9.16.2, and releases 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the 9.17 experimental development branch. All releases in the obsolete 9.13 and 9.15 development branches. All releases of BIND Supported Preview Edition from 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.18-S1.
Workarounds
None known.
ADP Enrichment
CVE Program Container
Additional References
- https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2020-8617
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/05/19/4
- https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4689
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200522-0002/
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/157836/BIND-TSIG-Denial-Of-Service.html
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4365-2/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4365-1/
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/05/msg00031.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WOGCJS2XQ3SQNF4W6GLZ73LWZJ6ZZWZI/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JKJXVBOKZ36ER3EUCR7VRB7WGHIIMPNJ/
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00041.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00044.html
References
- https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2020-8617
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/05/19/4
- https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4689
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200522-0002/
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/157836/BIND-TSIG-Denial-Of-Service.html
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4365-2/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4365-1/
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/05/msg00031.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WOGCJS2XQ3SQNF4W6GLZ73LWZJ6ZZWZI/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JKJXVBOKZ36ER3EUCR7VRB7WGHIIMPNJ/
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00041.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00044.html
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.