CVE-2020-36478
N/A
N/A
Summary
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.25.0 (and before 2.16.9 LTS and before 2.7.18 LTS). A NULL algorithm parameters entry looks identical to an array of REAL (size zero) and thus the certificate is considered valid. However, if the parameters do not match in any way, then the certificate should be considered invalid.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | n/a | n/a | affected |
Weaknesses
- n/a
ADP Enrichment
CVE Program Container
Additional References
- https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.25.0
- https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.16.9
- https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.7.18
- https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/issues/3629
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-756638.pdf
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00021.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/12/msg00036.html
References
- https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.25.0
- https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.16.9
- https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.7.18
- https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/issues/3629
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-756638.pdf
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00021.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/12/msg00036.html
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.