CVE-2020-14378
N/A
N/A
Summary
An integer underflow in dpdk versions before 18.11.10 and before 19.11.5 in the move_desc function can lead to large amounts of CPU cycles being eaten up in a long running loop. An attacker could cause move_desc to get stuck in a 4,294,967,295-count iteration loop. Depending on how vhost_crypto is being used this could prevent other VMs or network tasks from being serviced by the busy DPDK lcore for an extended period.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | dpdk | All dpdk versions before 18.11.10 and before 19.11.5 | affected |
Weaknesses
- CWE-191: CWE-191 leads to CWE-400
ADP Enrichment
CVE Program Container
Additional References
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/09/28/3
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879473
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4550-1/
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00004.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00006.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/5
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/2
References
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/09/28/3
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879473
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4550-1/
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00004.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00006.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/5
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/2
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.