CVE-2012-4566
N/A
N/A
Summary
The DTLS support in radsecproxy before 1.6.2 does not properly verify certificates when there are configuration blocks with CA settings that are unrelated to the block being used for verifying the certificate chain, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and spoof clients, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-4523.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | n/a | n/a | affected |
Weaknesses
- n/a
ADP Enrichment
CVE Program Container
Additional References
- https://postlister.uninett.no/sympa/arc/radsecproxy/2012-10/msg00001.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/51251
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/31/6
- http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2573
- https://postlister.uninett.no/sympa/arc/radsecproxy/2012-09/msg00001.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/17/7
- http://git.nordu.net/?p=radsecproxy.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=3682c935facf5ccd7fa600644bbb76957155c680
References
- https://postlister.uninett.no/sympa/arc/radsecproxy/2012-10/msg00001.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/51251
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/31/6
- http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2573
- https://postlister.uninett.no/sympa/arc/radsecproxy/2012-09/msg00001.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/17/7
- http://git.nordu.net/?p=radsecproxy.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=3682c935facf5ccd7fa600644bbb76957155c680
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.