CVE-2010-3192
N/A
N/A
Summary
Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | n/a | n/a | affected |
Weaknesses
- n/a
ADP Enrichment
CVE Program Container
Additional References
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8
References
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.